Open Education Courses
It is very encouraging to see the many opportunities available for Open Education ranging from Fully Online university courses to MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) most of them permitting free enrollment. This will definitely help the learners to widen their Life-long-learning. I will present below few MOOC and online courses I have completed during the last few months.
(a) Open Education Opportunities
(b) Open Education Materials
(c) Outputs – Openness learning reflection of the LiDA103 Course
(d) LiDA 103: 4R learning challenge- Output: Student Centered Online Learning-
A Short Review
(e) LiDA103: Copyright MCQ challenge
(f) LiDA103 Activity, Defining OER: Outputs – Implications of OER challenge.
(a) Open Education Opportunities
- Blended Learning Practice: BLP-2020. (MOOC by Commonwealth of Learning & Athabasca University, Canada). https://www.blpmooc.org/
This 4-week course is Open to teachers and other educational professionals considering implementing blended learning practice into their own classrooms or programs.
- Introduction to Technology Enabled Learning: TEL-MOOC. (MOOC- Commonwealth of Learning & Athabasca University, Canada). https://www.mooc4dev.org/telmooc
This 5-week Course is designed to help teachers build their knowledge and skillset in teaching and learning with technology.
- Understanding Open Educational Resources (OER): (Short Leaning module- by Commonwealth of Learning), https://learnoer.col.org/
This course intends to promote and develop the knowledge and understanding of open educational resources throughout the Commonwealth’s 53 member states.
- Open education, copyright and open licensing in a digital world (LiDA 103): (Micro Course- Otago Polytechnic & Commonwealth of Learning). https://oeru.org/learning-in-a-digital-age/
Participants will learn to effectively apply knowledge of copyright, open licensing and license remix compatibility utilizing open education practices to support tertiary learning in a global digital context.
“Open Educational Resources (OER) are teaching, learning, and research materials that are either (a) in the public domain or (b) licensed in a manner that provides everyone with free and perpetual permission to engage in the 5R activities.
(b) Open Education Materials
- Retain – make, own, and control a copy of the resource
- Reuse – use your original, revised, or remixed copy of the resource publicly
- Revise – edit, adapt, and modify your copy of the resource
- Remix – combine your original or revised copy of the resource with other existing material to create something new
- Redistribute – share copies of your original, revised, or remixed copy of the resource with others”
Ref: https://creativecommons.org/about/program-areas/education-oer/)
(c) This is my Blogpost on the Outputs – Openness learning reflection of the LiDA103 Course.
What is OEP
Open educational practice (OEP) is the use of Open Educational Resources (OERs) for teaching and learning in order to innovate the learning process (Andrade et al., 2011).
Definition OEP
Following definitions presents various aspects of OEP:
- Jones, 2004 defined OEPs as practices which support the (re)use and production of OER through institutional policies, promote innovative pedagogical models, and respect and empower learners as co-producers on their lifelong learning path. OEP address the whole OER governance community: policy makers, managers/ administrators of organisations, educational professionals and learners.
I like this definition since it includes OER development, promoting learning and involvement of stakeholders.
- Wiley & Hilton, 2018 considered OEP as an OER enabled pedagogy and defined it as a ‘set of teaching and learning practices that are only possible or practical in the context of the 5R (retain, reuse, revise, remix, and redistribute) permissions that are characteristic of OER.
I like this definition since it reminds us on the 5R context of OERs.
From OER to OEP
“In OEP, OERs are more and more used within educational scenarios, learner generated content is produced and shared. Learning is becoming an open process in which institutional boundaries, boundaries through pre-defined curricula and biographical learning sequences are extended” (Conole & Ehlers, U.D. 2010).
The next phase in OER development will see a shift from a focus on resources to a focus on OEP. These comprise a combination of open resources use and open learning architectures that could transform learning into 21st century learning environments in which universities, adult learners, and citizens are provided with opportunities to shape their lifelong learning pathways in an autonomous and self-guided way (Ehlers, 2011).
List of key OE Practices:
Open educational practice encompasses flowing: (Beetham et al., 2012).
- “Production, management, use and reuse of open educational resources.
- Developing and applying open/public pedagogies in teaching practice.
- Open learning and gaining access to open learning opportunities.
- Practising open scholarship to encompass open access publication, open science and open research.
- Open sharing of teaching ideas and know-how.
- Using open technologies (web-based platforms, applications and services) in an educational context”.
Three important Implications of OEP for Education:
I have extracted following three items from Beetham et al., 2012.
- “OEP can expand the opportunity of accessing high-quality educational contents for learners.
- OEP can effect a practice-centered approach that consists of five enablers namely OER, open teaching, open collaboration, open assessment, and enabling technology.
- With OPE, learners can attribute open licences to their prepared open learning materials so other learners can reuse them as OER”.
My Learning Reflection:
- Description: I chose to study on Open Educational Practices (OEP). I was very keen to learn about Open Educational Resources (OERs) and in this course I came across OEP. I wanted to extend my understating beyond OER by studying this topic. Apart from the links to literature and the OER knowledge cloud repository, I was able to collect few more important references. Five out of 6 references are having creative commons licences that gave me freedom to extract with attribution.
- Evaluation: I think it was very good I chose to study about OEP since it is a continuation of OER development. This has helped in my professional development also.
- Analysis: I learned that OEP is considered as OER enabled pedagogy and it spans from use of OER and sharing in educational context. I have been developing few OERs in the past while learning about it and now I am ready to explore further on its application.
- Conclusion: Since OER and OEP are recently introduced topics I think they both help learners, teachers and other stakeholders in further applying in improving teaching and sharing at institutional level.
- Plan: I hope to develop more OERs in the subject I am teaching at the university and begin to incorporate these in to lectures so that students are aware of the usage and licence criteria. I also would advise the institution on the possibility of applying OEP across the campus.
References:
Andrade, A., Ehlers, U.-D., Caine, A., Carneiro, R., Conole, G., Holmberg, C., Kairamo, A., Koskinen, T., Kretschmer, T., Moe-Pryce, N., Mundin, P., Nozes, J., Policarpo, V., Reinhardt, R., Richter, T., Silva, G., & Varoglu, Z. (2011). OEP Guide: Guidelines for Open Educational Practices in Organizations. Quality, 1–8. BY-NC-SA http://oerworkshop.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/44605120/OPAL-OEP-guidelines.pdf
Beetham, H., Falconer, I., Mcgill, L., & Littlejohn, A. (2012). Open Practices: a briefing paper. Jisc, February
https://oersynth.pbworks.com/w/page/51668352/OpenPracticesBriefing BY-NC
Conole, G.C., Ehlers, U.D. (2010): Open Educational Practices: Unleashing the power of OER. Paper presented to UNESCO Workshop on OER in Namibia 2010. Windhoek
Ehlers, U.-D. (2011). Extending the Territory: From Open Educational Resources to Open Educational Practices. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 15(2), 1–10. BY-NC-ND http://journals.akoaotearoa.ac.nz/index.php/JOFDL/article/view/64
Jones, J. P. (2004). Shifting focus. Positively Aware : The Monthly Journal of the Test Positive Aware Network, 15(6), 26. BY-NC-SA
Wiley, D., & Hilton, J. (2018). Defining OER-enabled pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 19(4), 133–147. CC-BY https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3601
(d) LiDA 103: 4R learning challenge- Output:
Student Centered Online Learning- A Short Review
| Student-Centered Learning I would like begin with the definition of Student-Centred Learning (SCL) I found in this publication issued by the European Students Union. “Student-Centred Learning represents both a mindset and a culture within a given higher education institution and is a learning approach which is broadly related to, and supported by, constructivist theories of learning. It is characterised by innovative methods of teaching which aim to promote learning in communication with teachers and other learners and which take students seriously as active participants in their own learning, fostering transferable skills such as problem-solving, critical thinking and reflective thinking.” (Attard et al, 2010). Zeki & Guneyli, 2014 in a study on participants of teacher education programme have also reported that the Student Centered Education (SCE) approach had a positive impact on the development of cognitive skills. It has helped them to develop their reflective, critical and creative thinking; problem-solving; and questioning skills. Group work activities have contributed to development of social and affective skills in this cohort. |
Images modified by Remixing1.Online learning Img by Oconnoras CC-BY-SA 2 Graduated student CC0 | Online Learning “With the advent of the Internet and the World Wide Web, the potential for reaching learners around the world increased greatly, and today’s online learning offers rich educational resources in multiple media and the capability to support both real-time and asynchronous communication between instructors and learners as well as among different learners. Online learning has become popular because of its potential for providing more flexible access to content and instruction at any time, from any place. In addition, online learning offerings are being designed to enhance the quality of learning experiences and outcomes” (Means et al., 2010). |
Blended Learning by Christophermccarthy CC0 | Blended Learning Blended learning is a term applied to the practice of providing instruction and learning experiences through some combination of both face-to-face and technology-mediated learning. During the technology-mediated components of these learning experiences, students are not required to be physically together in one place but may be connected digitally through online communities. For example, one blended learning course could involve students attending a class taught by a teacher in a traditional classroom setting while also completing online components of the course independently, outside of the classroom, on an online learning platform (Cleveland-Innes & Wilton, 2018). |
| Student Centeredness with Online Learning In summary ‘Student Centeredness’ is evident during innovative approaches of online or blended learning |
| My Reflections This blog presents a short review on Student centeredness in Online learning. I have compiled an extract of a copyrighted article (text in parenthesis) with text and three other media items shared from sources published under Creative Commons licenses CC0, CC-BY and CC-BY-SA. I have listed all the attributions to the text extracts using APA referencing style. First image is a remix of two images with CC-BY-SA and CC0 while second image is having CC0. I have followed the acronym TASL, which stands for Title, Author, Source, License for attribution of images with relevant links embedded in the file name.. Since highest CC licence used is CC-BY-SA, I would like to apply the same license (CC-BY-SA) to my derivative work which is a free cultural works license. I must thank LiDA103 organizers for giving me guidance to produce this blog post. |
| References: Attard, A., Santa, R., Geven, K., & Di Iorio, E. (2010). Student-Centred Learning: Toolkit for Students, Staff and HigherEducation Institutions. Brussels: © European Students Union (All rights reserved article: extracted for review purpose) Cleveland-Innes, M., & Wilton, D. (2018). Guide to Blended Learning. Burnaby: COMMONWEALTH OF LEARNING. (Creative Common Licence CC-BY-SA) Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf (Document in public domain. Authorization to reproduce in whole or in part has been granted) Zeki, Canan Perkan, & Güneyli, Ahmet. (2014). Student teachers’ perceptions about their experiences in a student centered course. South African Journal of Education, 34(3), 01-07 (Creative Common Licence CC-BY) |
License:
Jayantha Weerasinghe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
(e) LiDA 103: Copyright MCQ challenge
“An academic in a University has been invited to publish an article in his university webpage. He decided to explore the websites www.flickr.com and www.intechopen.com to retrieve suitable images and selected text based information that can be incorporated”.
Q1. Can he use an image tagged as ‘all rights reserved’ from flickr.com?
- Distractor < A > – Yes, with prior permission from the flickr.com.
Wrong, ownership belongs to flicker members who have uploaded items - Answer < B > – Yes, with prior permission from the owner of the item.
Correct. - Distractor < C > – No, ‘all rights reserved’ items in flickr.com cannot be used by others.
Wrong, can be used with proper procedure - Distractor < D > – No, University website has public access so cannot use external items.
Wrong, external links can be inserted in a web page
Q2. Can he reproduce without permission part of text from an article in an open access journal published by intechopen.com?.
- Distractor < A > – Yes, all journals at inetchopen.com permits that.
Wrong, each journal may have different levels of permissions
- Distractor < B > – No, require prior permission from the intechopen.com.
Wrong, it is not necessary to contact the main site - Answer < C > – Yes, as long the attribution to the source is given.
Correct - Distractor < D > – No, require prior permission from the Journal.
Wrong, does not require if attribution is given
LiDA103: Copyright MCQ challenge by Jayantha Weerasinghe is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
(f) LiDA 103 Activity, Defining OER: Outputs – Implications of OER challenge.
LiDA Activity Defining OER: Outputs – Implications of OER challenge –
Article Summary write-up
1.Link to article: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/3009
2. Reference: Annand, D., & Jensen, T. (2017). Incentivizing the Production and Use of Open Educational Resources in Higher Education Institutions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i4.3009
Article: Incentivizing the Production and Use of Open Educational Resources in Higher Education Institutions
Summary:
Annand & Jensen, 2017 reviewing related articles discussed the financial and other issues that can affect adoption of OERs in substituting for conventional textbooks. A survey conducted among US faculty by Allen and Seaman (2014) has shown that too much was needed to locate, evaluate, and incorporate material in to the curriculum. Kortemeyer (2013) has identified four main issues that prevented more widespread use of OER as: time spent, issues of quality control, faculty expertise levels and lack of faculty interest to the OER ideology.
Domination of commercial publishers to generate more income has been achieved by introducing frequent updated versions of textbooks and introducing costly e-learning supplementary activities for students to purchase. Wiley (2015) has stated that awareness of OER is more important to develop a critical mass of OER users. Despite these difficulties, several large scale OER initiatives have been successfully developed by institutions such as MIT, Open University of U.K., OpenStax College in Canada and BCcampus.
Financial models to sustain the OER adoption by institutions have been proposed to reduce the amount spent on conventional material cost savings by students. Athabasca University (AU) has adopted open access policies offering fully online courses. AU’s success story explains how a conventional textbook for one of their popular course in accounting has been converted to OER material in 2014 with the CC-BY-SA-NC license. Development of digital course material, consenting by the copyright holder for release under creative commons licence and AU’s strong incentive have contributed to this success. AU now enjoy reduced operation fees with this type of courses, faculty members feel happy to contribute in this scholarly activity and students need not purchase conventional textbooks.
- Other Related Articles:
Allen, I. & Seaman, J. (2014). Opening the curriculum: Open educational resources in U.S. higher education, 2014. Report published by Babson Survey Research Group.
Kortemeyer, G. (2013) Ten years later: Why open educational resources have not noticeably affected higher education, and why we should care. Educause Review, Nov/Dec 2013.
Wiley, D. (2015, December 3). Reflections on open education and the path forward. Iterating Toward Openness. Retrieved from http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/4082.
This Blog explains about Open Educational courses, Resources and Practices with special emphasis on copyrights. There are useful references too.
Images modified by Remixing